澳洲环境学作业代写 大众汽车

大众汽车最大股东之一挪威国家基金威胁要起诉大众汽车,要求赔偿约6.8亿欧元,同时向美国支付约133亿欧元的罚款和赔偿金。2016年9月,一名大众工程师亲自出面向美国法院作证,称操纵尾气排放测试可以追溯到2006年。一旦美国的零售商和消费者达成和解,责任费用将达到152亿欧元。供应商博世(Bosch)卷入事件的更多证据浮出,美国文件显示,操纵排放测试一直是大众与这家分包商之间的“公开秘密”。我们马上就能看到多个漏洞。这个公开的秘密违反了他们的反托拉斯法。这一准则是对公平竞争的保护。例如,员工不能向可能妨碍产品生产或销售的竞争对手透露私人信息。还有一个准则是对所有合同伙伴都要公平,即不偏袒任何一方。在商业方面,他们的职责是维护市场的公平竞争。这个大众和博世之间的公开秘密暴露了两家公司之间的秘密关系。第一,博世知道测试存在缺陷,并对公众隐瞒了这个秘密;第二,大众选择博世,并继续优先与他们合作,因为这个秘密,以及他们需要在有限的各方之间保持它。他们不仅打破了不显示偏袒的标准准则,他们还向另一家公司披露私人信息,他们给这家公司更多的生意因为他们很容易与其他公司做生意。他们表现出的偏袒使竞争市场的动态不公平,而且他们选择与博施保持秘密和排他性的商业关系来保护他们的个人议程,这绝对不是在保护任何竞争。经过讨论,我的同事和我认为解决这个问题的最好办法是重新设计他们的商业模式,剔除所有不道德的行为,将业务平均分配给多个承包商,而不是让一家公司垄断所有的合同工作。

澳洲环境学作业代写 大众汽车

Norway’s state fund, one of VW’s largest shareholders threatens to sue VW for ~680 million euros, while fines and compensation payments to the US amounts to ~13.3 billion euros. In September 2016, a VW engineer personally comes out and testifies to the US court that emission test manipulation dates back to 2006. Once a settlement is reached between retailers/customers in US, liability fees reach 15.2 billion euros. More proof emerges of supplier Bosch’s involvement with affair, US documents show manipulation in emission tests had been an “open secret” between VW and the subcontractor. Immediately we can see multiple breaches. This open secret is a violation of their Anti-trust code. This code stands for the protection of fair competition. For example, employees cannot not disclose private information with competitors that could interfere with production or sales of a product. There is also a code of being fair with all contract partners i.e. not showing favoritism to any one of them. On the business side, it is their job to safeguard fair competition in the market. This open secret between VW and Bosch exposes a secret relationship between the two companies. One, Bosch knew of the faulty tests and kept the secret hidden from the general public and two, VW chooses Bosch and continues to prioritize business with them because of this secret and their need to keep it between a limited amount of parties. Not only do they break the standard code of not showing favoritism, they are also disclosing private information with another company and they are giving this company more business because of their vulnerability of doing business with other companies. They have made the dynamics of a competitive market unfair by showing favoritism and they are definitely not safeguarding any competition by choosing to have a secret and exclusive business relationship with Bosche that protects their personal agenda. After discussion, my peers and I decided the best way to resolve this would be to redesign their business model, take out all unethical behavior, and split the business evenly with multiple contractors versus allowing one company to monopolize all of VW’s contracted work.

本段内容来自网络 并不是我们的写手作品 请勿直接剽窃,查重100%,造成后果与本站无关。如需定制论文请记得联系我们。

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注